Tuesday, 30 June 2015

Hustlers Convention

'Oooh, baby I like it raw.'
-Sushi bar customer

With a lot of things, I usually find the original is my preferred choice. Despite more polished and better produced follow ups often appearing in the music and comedy industries, I tend to favour the rougher, more erratic and raw feel of their predecessors, where ideas are more fresh and awakening.

So, you ask, what is the original rap album? Many would point to the likes of Gil Scott Heron and the Last Poets as possible contenders, quite rightly so. But with Heron switching between poetry to drums and soul tracks, his maybe can't be considered as 'rap' albums. And The Last Poets clearly laid foundations with their spoken word raps over drums.

But, under the sort of pseudonym you would expect of a modern rapper, with raps that flowed in rhythm to the music of Kool and the Gang, it was Last Poet member, Jalaluddin Mansur Nuriddin as Lightnin' Rod, with the concept album 'Hustlers Convention', that can perhaps truly be called the raw original. And this is the answer that filmmaker Mike Todd has come to with his documentary of the same name.


Telling the story of prison story toasting and its influence on popular culture styles of the Sixties and early Seventies, 'Hustlers Convention' (the documentary) uses interviews with various poets of the era to show its development into early forms of rap music. Throughout these interviews, animated sequences visualise the story of 'Hustlers Convention' (the album) , throwing in interviews with rappers KRS-One, Chuck D, Melle Mel Ice-T and MC Lyte discussing their memories of the album and the influence it had on them and an entire culture. There is then talk of the album's making and interviews with Nuriddin, rapping about life, the universe and everything, before British poets that have worked with him telling their tales.

'Hustlers Convention' (the documentary) shuns a linear narrative, mixing different periods in time throughout, with different parts of the story flowing likes rivers in parallel towards the film's conclusion. This means it never gets too tiresome, labouring a single point, keeping the rhythm flowing, in what is a reasonably timed ninety-plus minutes. The different generations and backgrounds of those involved also shed different lights and perspectives, making it far from one dimensional.

While the animated accompaniment to the songs could draw comparisons with 'Searching for Sugar Man', the similarities can be stopped there, with Nuriddin involved throughout and happy to talk about his life, rather than being made into a mythical, mystery man. Though maybe this is what 'Hustlers Convention' (the documentary) lacks: a hook.

'Hustlers Convention' (the album) is made out to be the sort of album that everybody knows, yet nobody knows; the most copied album in history, that nobody's ever heard of. But not enough is perhaps made of this irony. With Kool and the Gang signed to a different label than that of the release of 'Hustlers Convention' (the album), the album was quickly pulled, with few copies officially sold, leaving little fortune or fame for the man where it all began. In the words of the album's final track 'Sentenced to the Chair': 'The real hustlers who were ripping off billions from the unsuspecting millions who are programmed to think they could win.'

But maybe the fact that this isn't dwelt on too much is again a strength. Nurridin himself, now in his seventies, doesn't sound too bitter about this fact, performing the album at London's Jazz Cafe at the film's climax, knowing that his words will have influence for generations to come, and maybe 'Hustlers Convention' (the documentary) can claim its part in furthering this.

'Raw I'ma give it to ya, with no trivia...'

Wednesday, 3 June 2015

Every 14 Days...(26)

Mostly Brilliant (Douglas Adams)

Step three in my mission to make my way through all incarnations of 'The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy' in no particular order - which is probably a way it's expected to be done.


Growing up, I watched the Eighties BBC TV series a number of times on good ol' VHS; and subsequently I have ventured to the cinema to watch the more modern film version which, despite having Tim from 'The Office' in it, doesn't exactly enhance the series. Though now, despite the fact the radio show came first, I have now attempted to read the five-part-trilogy of novels that were based on it.

Now, I don't particularly do sci-fi. I like 'Red Dwarf' (up to Series Six only, of course - I'm not peculiar) and have read a couple of the spin-off books. I've also watched some films. But largely, it's not my bag (that's my bag over there, could you pass it to me please?).

So, having enjoyed one incarnation, and not so much enjoyed a second incarnation, would I enjoy this next attempt? In a word: mostly yes.

Largely, to start, it is quite faithful to the TV series script, which is (apparently) faithful to the radio series script, though the first two books came before the TV series anyway, so it's all the same thing either heard, read or viewed. And this I like, reeling the Peter Jones narration in my head as I read.

As my dad has told me, the TV series (and subsequently the film) only go so far in the overall story, with the radio series going much further. So, about halfway through the trilogy of five, I suddenly have no knowledge of what is going to happen and can't read in my memory of the TV series script. This makes it just like reading normal books, having to read the words to know what happens. I mean, really?!

The books are sharp, witty and cleverly make you look at humanity from an outsider's point of view, which can leave you feeling a little depressed. Overall, the story starts off strong, though as the books progress - and maybe this is the blinkered by television me writing - the story can become more outlandish (literally) and asks quite a lot of the imagination of the reader, which the non-sci-fi-loving me probably doesn't have. For me, after a while the story goes a bit too far, maybe a downside of reading the books consecutively without a break from the madness. Maybe a reason the TV series only took the story so far - or was that more due to time and budget constraints?

Despite the wit and charm throughout, perhaps the reason why I don't really read sci-fi or fantasy (apart from that I've kissed a girl) is that with so many 'made-up' names and places, my mind quickly fails to take in these words that have no meaning outside of the book and once they are raised later in the book, I've already forgotten them. Perhaps this is why I'm so bad at learning languages, or I just lack imagination, ruined and cynical from having seen 'Never Mind the Buzzcocks'.

But I'm being negative here, when I should be looking for its Buddha side. 'The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy' is an excellent lampooning of humanity and how insignificant we probably all are in the grand scheme of things (not being negative here). In a word, it's mostly brilliant.

...

Cleverly, I read the books in paper form, avoiding the vision of the future 'The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy' creates in which everybody uses a tablet device in which to get all their knowledge of the known universe...

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
Days to read: 12
Days per book: 14.9

The Restaurant at the End of the Universe
Days to read: 12
Days per book: 14.9

Life, the Universe and Everything
Days to read: 13
Days per book: 14.8

So Long, and Thanks for all the Fish
Days to read: 14
Days per book: 14.8

Mostly Harmless
Days to read: 25
Days per book: 14.9