Before his more mainstream success, kick-started by 2004's "Nobody
Knows", Kore-eda Hirokazu was a documentarian who branched out into an interesting
brand of cinema with slow pacing, mood lighting and naturalistic acting. His
documentary experience had been put to use, with the use of long takes,
improvised dialogue and even clips from previously filmed interviews.
Starting with the mournful "Maborosi", followed-up with the
inventive and thought-provoking "After Life", 2001's
"Distance" is the third in his initial trio of films that are similar
in style and unlike his subsequent films that would see him garner more
mainstream recognition abroad.
Obviously based on the Aum cult and the Tokyo gas attack of 1995, the
"Ark of Truth" cult attack three years previous on water supplies to
the city left dozens dead. As an annual remembrance, four relatives of members
of the cult meet and visit the lake where they were based, but the reasons for
this act are unclear.
Having their transportation mysteriously stolen, they are left stranded
out in the forest with no phone signal for help. It is here their party becomes
five, as former cult member Sakata (Tadanobu Asano) - though he abandoned them
before the attack - also finds his bike stolen and unable to get home.
He takes them to his former living quarters while he was with the cult
to spend the night. Here they discuss their family members and Sakata's
recollections of them and muse on how things came to be; before going their
separate ways in the morning to meet "same time next year."
With the picnic, day out feel, the film is shot largely in a homemade
style, with handheld cameras and grainy footage, adding to the sense of mystery
and intrigue. These blurred images are contrasted with the more conventionally
shot flashbacks that each of the five have as to their family members as they
first started to realise they were members of a cult. Though these images'
greater clarity do not make the picture any clearer for those left behind.
The interactions between the five are natural for a group that has
little in common other than being relatives of cult members. Perhaps reflecting
the fact that Kore-eda saw the film evolve and gave the cast members differing direction,
forcing improvisation within the long takes, handled well by the cast of Asano,
ARATA, Susumu Terajima, Yusuke Iseya and Yui Natsukawa. Indeed, the film is
littered with shots of the five positioned together, but looking in various
directions or visibly apart; distant from each other, as well as their loved
ones. Though as a double-edged sword, the documentary nature of the filming and
dialogue may frustrate some viewers, as he favours naturalism over
entertainment.
Perhaps intentionally, much like "Maborosi" before it, there
is no concluding answer, as the motivations behind such acts will forever be
unexplained. Though if "Maborosi", as has been described, is a haiku,
then "Distance" would perhaps be better as a novel: An exploration of
mindset, but unable to deliver the rounded conclusions required in the
cinematic form. Indeed Kore-eda went on to spend much of the time after making
"Distance" writing. One almost feels that if you were to combine
"Distance" with the interviews of "After Life" you would
have something along the lines of Haruki Murakami's "Underground" on
the Aum attacks.
Kore-eda offers something of an ending to a story, though it is one
with open ends in-line with the rest of the film. Atsushi (ARATA), the supposed
brother of one of the cult members with whom Sakata was close, may not be the
man he claims. Some beautiful cinematography from Yutaka Yamazaki to close
reveal he is perhaps the estranged son of the cult leader, a man to which the
others will no doubt hold some contempt. But this only furthers any confusion
that may already be present in a film that asks many questions.
Alongside "Hana" and "Air Doll", "Distance" is in the trio of Kore-eda films to gain most criticism, for being a slow and drudging watch with a lack of satisfying conclusion to justify it all. But with the naturalism, air of intrigue and lack of conclusion as an end in itself, "Distance" has strong elements of good filmmaking and it is wrong to call it a bad film, rather one requiring more form to satisfy a wider audience.